You are here:   Civilisation >  Books > Of Human Frailty
 

The distinguished American critic Edmund Wilson called Somerset Maugham "a half-trashy novelist who writes badly, but is patronised by half-serious readers who do not care much about writing". Selina Hastings observes that Wilson hadn't read Maugham before reviewing his penultimate, rather poor, novel Then and Now, and dismissing him in this lordly fashion. If he was right, there were enough "half-serious readers" in those days to make a modern novelist green with envy. Maugham's last major novel, The Razor's Edge (1944), sold half a million copies in the USA within a few weeks of publication, and had notched up three million sales there by the end of the decade. A less ambitious novel, Christmas Holiday (1939), sold almost 100,000 copies in Britain alone. It's reasonable to suppose that Wilson's judgment may have been tainted by envy.

Whether you despise Maugham as Wilson did or admire him like Evelyn Waugh, you have to admit that his success as novelist, dramatist, short-story writer, essayist, and provider of material for movies and television was phenomenal. He was fortunate in his period, of course. There were then unprecedented numbers of readers, serious or half-serious as may be, not as yet seduced by television. He pleased them for more than half a century and still pleases today when collections of his short stories and some of his novels remain in print. This is in part doubtless because he offers easy reading. But he has other merits, of which more later.

He was well rewarded. In the 1930s a household staff of 13 served him at the Villa Mauresque in the South of France where he spent a large part of his life. On visits to London he stayed at the Dorchester or the Ritz. His books were widely translated; he was a best-seller in Japan as well as in Britain and the USA. His long-short story Rain, filmed at least twice, made him a million dollars. More than 90 films and TV adaptations have been made of his work. 

He became the Grand Old Man of English Letters and, on his friend Winston Churchill's recommendation, was made a Companion of Honour. Maugham himself thought that he should have received the OM. The CH meant "very well done, but..."

Selina Hastings, or her publisher, has given her admirable biography a misleading title. The old boy's secret, carefully kept from his readers, was revealed long ago. He was no sooner dead than he was dragged from the closet and his sex life exposed to the world, by his nephew Robin and by an old boyfriend, Beverley Nichols, who called him "the most sexually voracious man I ever knew". (And he knew a few.) Subsequent biographies by Ted Morgan and Robert Calder gave the details, Morgan dwelling on every sexual encounter with salacious disapproval. Selina Hastings has little to add but she treats the matter with sense and good taste as nothing much out of the ordinary. 

Maugham himself said that his tragedy — or perhaps it was misfortune — was to have pretended that he was three-quarters straight and a quarter gay when really it was the other way round. Some have doubted, either despite or because of, his turbulent marriage to Syrie, Dr Barnardo's daughter, whether he was even as much as a quarter straight. Selina Hastings however, describing his long affair with an actress, Sue Jones, the daughter of a well-known late Victorian playwright, leads one to conclude that his own summing-up of his condition was accurate. He was homosexual in youth, bisexual until he was middle-aged, then exclusively homosexual again; quite a common pattern. Sue Jones was the model for his most engaging heroine, Rosie, in his best novel Cakes and Ale

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
creepingdoubt
September 30th, 2009
1:09 PM
especially for other writers, maugham is extraordinarily good company. he doesn't mind showing off his skills a bit and letting his technique glisten in the narrative flow. in this way he's not unlike the american john o'hara, another writer who can teach other writers a thing or two, and who was also formidably prolific and, like maugham, grew rich from writing prose. edmund wilson didn't admire o'hara either.

Susie
September 7th, 2009
12:09 PM
If Alan wants to cite one of Maugham's stylistic tricks, why doesn't he use a genuine example rather than making one up? Maugham's writing style doesn't deserve to be dismissed with "replete in cliches". It has a strange power about it. A currently underrated writer (WS, not Alan).

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.