You are here:   Dispatches > Caracas: Chávez's Secret Fan Club
 

Then there are the government chavistas - Chávez's cronies. These soi-disant representatives and enforcers of popular power are making millions, even as they rail against the wealthy oligarchy against whom they say they must protect the Venezuelans. Chávez's former Vice-President, José Vicente Rangel, denounces those who live in the prosperous area of Altamira - but he lives in Altamira himself, surrounded by 20 bodyguards. Not for them the state schools, in which they profess so much faith. Their children attend the most prestigious private academies in Caracas, including the German, American and British schools.

A lot of money is also flowing to the opportunistic chavistas. Although not directly in government, these are the contractors, bankers and distributors who profit from the regime. They overcharge the government, or the end client, or both, pocket the difference and give a kickback to the minister in charge. Everyone is happy as the public coffers are emptied into their personal bank accounts and the sale of cars and luxury goods breaks all records. No better than British chavs, they'll buy anything as long as the logo is big enough.

But it is behind the crumbling walls of the Country Club mansions that the most pathetic chavistas are bred - the secret ones. They can no longer afford to keep up appearances since Chávez is nationalising estates of 100,000 acres or more. The Country Club used to name and shame those members remiss in their subscriptions on a wall. Now, the list is so embarrassingly long that the club has stopped. In order to restore their fortunes, some covert chavistas have grovelled to the government. At the same time they masquerade as principled members of the upper class and mock the heathen and gauche chavistas while playing golf or sipping a whiskicito at a drinks party. Yet they fret that the secret source of their restored glory will be discovered and they will be reviled by their old-money friends in the opposition.

After all, conspicuous consumption is no longer an option for non-chavistas, for among them Orwellian paranoia has set in. That
includes the Country Club set, which has retreated into a fortress mentality. The built-up walls surrounding their mansions now have electric wires above the spikes and are surveyed by video cameras and armed guards in fortified cubicles with bulletproof glass. But the guards themselves are often suspected as part of the problem, as probable chavistas. So arming your security guards, as my brother has done at his dairy farm, is no guarantee. He has stayed away in recent months for fear that he may land at the airstrip one day and find his weapons used against him. This fear and class hatred is part of Chávez's design. At the end of his TV speeches, there is a graphic incitement to violence - footage of the poor setting cars on fire, looting and throwing Molotov cocktails. It's no wonder the prices of apartments have skyrocketed while those of houses have remained flat.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
answers?
January 5th, 2009
2:01 PM
Three basic questions facing those who favor authoritarian or totalitarian governments: Would you want to live under one? Do you have the moral right to enjoy the freedoms (e. g., the right to hotly criticize your government, the right to organize demonstations against those in power, the right to work to remove those in power, etc.) that you would deny to others? If you claim that right, on what moral basis does it rest?

Anonymous
January 5th, 2009
1:01 PM
This article is clearly the very biased diatribe of a person who lived a very privileged life in Venezuela. Mr Chavez is not perfect, by any means, but his opposition is worse. During the 2001 coup attempt, they turned the tanks on te people. During the 2002-2003 strike, they tried to cripple the only livlihood of all Venezuelans. Yes, life in the Country Club is not the same as before, but the violence and class hatred comes more from the decades of abuse, of unbelievable discrepancies between the rich and the poor. Does the author remember the mass slaughter of civilians in 1989 as a result of Carlos Andres Perez' ill-considered economic policies and his government's brutal repression of civil unrest? Something had to change, and the change is happening , like it or not. True, this government has many flaws--corruption is rampant, there is more violence in the streets--but it has also made some important changes in the social structure, not only in Venezuela but in the rest of South America. A more balanced view might be more persuasive.

Anonymous
January 5th, 2009
11:01 AM
She should stop whinning. This is what's wrong with elitist thinking

Anonymous
January 5th, 2009
5:01 AM
wow, stuart... a bit difficult to think there is any hope for Venezuela if it must "reside in a rise in the rule of law" when the "law" is whatever the dictator says it is.

stuart munro
January 5th, 2009
1:01 AM
I'm afraid this article is not persuasive. After seeing John Pilger's film The War on Democracy, it seems clear that whatever faults Chavez has pale in comparison to those of his political opponents. Little tricks like the attempted armed overthrow of Chavez when was popularly elected, and the propaganda films released to the western press pretty much discredit the views of writers like Neumann. As for Venezuela, its hope for a peaceful future must reside in a rise in the rule of law. One facet of that would probably preclude private armed security forces.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
7:01 PM
I believe the author has fooled herself. She should question her child-eyes view of Venezuela. The adult might have noticed the dispossessed before Chavez rallied them. And the adult would have to decide whether the Chavistas are paid lackeys or worshippers of a Demi-God, whereas this author sees no contradiction in calling them both. The author expresses the paranoia of the rich in condemning hidden counry club Chavistas only to mention the paranoia explicitly while not seeing it in herself. Still, as an American, the day the people stop supporting Chavez is the day I will be happy to see him go.

Morris
January 4th, 2009
7:01 PM
I am an Italian born American who has family near Caracas and have viste there many times. In my humble opinion I have seen huge change from 1982 till 2008 in Venezuela. Basically from bad to good to great to o.k. to horrible to now utterly pathetic. What the heck is Chavez thinking? One of the greatest sins man can perform is greed. Do not let this wolf in sheep's clothing cloud the true good hearted, hard working spirit of the Venezuela majority

Pulseguy
January 4th, 2009
6:01 PM
Ms. Neumann's comment that there was no class hatred in the '70s suggests she is out of touch with what she writes. Of course, there was class hatred in the 70s; and the 60s, the 80's etc. There always is class resentment. And, the rich will always be villified in simplistic terms, as will the poor. Chavez will stay until even the hordes can see past his rhetoric, then he will escape with his billions and the average Venezuelan will be left with the clean-up.

Edward
January 4th, 2009
5:01 PM
Neumann's writings ensure continued success for Chavez. The only people who sympathise w/ Neumann are other Neumann's of which there are few and she writes even they are split. Good riddance.

Anonymous
January 4th, 2009
4:01 PM
If Hugo the Terrible stays there will be repression and death. If Hugo the Terrible goes there will be repression and death.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
More Dispatches
Popular Standpoint topics