You are here:   Civilisation >  Critique > Could Picasso Draw Better than Raphael?
 

Whereas Ingres was schooled in the old academic tradition, a tradition whose formal content was grounded in the geometric rigour of classical sculpture, Picasso's latter-day schooling was very different. This isn't just a matter of the increasingly pervasive naturalism that set in after the French Revolution. It is more specifically a matter of the influence of photography depriving the academic tradition of that formal rigour after it burst on to the scene around 1840. The old tradition's adulterated substitute retained conventions like narrative content and, as Picasso's Vollard portrait eloquently testifies, refined tonal technique in draughtsmanship. But the flesh and blood was gone.

This is abundantly evident in a drawing primer Picasso used as a student, the Cours de Dessin the French painter Charles Bargue produced in collaboration with his better-known colleague Jean-Léon Gérôme. Published as a set of 197 loose-leaf lithographs between 1868 and 1871, the Cours reappeared in book format in 2003. 

The plates in the three-part Cours include sculpture (anatomical parts and whole-figure classical masterpieces), contemporary renditions of Old Master drawings, and Bargue's own studies of male nudes from life. Apart from the life studies the Cours was mainly intended for commercial artists, and this might serve as justification for Bargue's simplistic, pseudo-classical pedagogy. But photography was a crucial factor in that pedagogy. It profoundly affected the way the world was seen by artists, including artists who considered themselves heirs to the academic tradition dating back to Louis XIV and Colbert.

By the time he was in his early teens, Picasso was copying Bargue plates including the Theseus from the Parthenon (one of the pedimental figures in the British Museum), the Belvedere Torso, and an unidentified male "Torse Antique" showing the torso's rear. In doing so Picasso internalised Bargue's treatment of the figure as the byproduct of reflected light. He won the approbation of his teachers, his artist father included, by producing tonal studies involving meticulous gradations from highlight to midtone to shadow in which the highly specific and complex shapes comprising the original sculptures — the Theseus and Belvedere Torso, at least — receive generic, simplistic treatment.

Bargue's Torse Antique, which Picasso copied very faithfully, is a particularly flagrant example of this degradation of classical form. The clearly outlined, extensively shadowed figure is reduced to a sort of diagrammatic, chiaroscuro collage — remarkably abstract and inorganic. Within a decade of making this copy, Picasso treated the dejected figures in a celebrated Blue Period work, Two Women Seated at a Bar, in a manner strikingly reminiscent of the Torse Antique plate. Here too the figures, seen from the rear, are clearly outlined while the bony structures of their backs are even more diagrammatically rendered, with a portion of the shoulder blades and the adjoining spinal channels sunk in Bargue-like shadow.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Chaszz
May 31st, 2012
2:05 PM
Ingres was no 'Ingres' either in many ways. Although he preached the classical verities, he relentlessly flattened the space in his best pictures like an Italian medieval painter, or like Picasso in 'Les Demoiselles d'Avignon.' There is the famous Ingres 'Grand Odalisque' with a face that is a flattened combination of profile and three-quarters view (eerily presaging Picasso's portraits) and the anatomically wrong five extra vertebrae. The pose is also impossible for a human being to assume and looks it. When Ingres was most enamored of tradition, as in his 'Apotheosis of Homer' or 'The Vow of Louis XIII,' he was sugary, sentimental and boring. His most powerful paintings are those like his portraits and nudes where the space is flattened into seeming relief rather than sculpture in the round. These are full of energy and are prescient of the spatial flattening in modern painting, where the formal primacy of the flat picture plane came to be widely asserted.

Toronto
May 31st, 2012
12:05 PM
While Picasso is no Ingres, there are a few unfairnesses in the article. A better sample of some of the mid-1910s drawings would show that Picasso was actually aware of -- and drew carefully -- the bone structure and 3-d outline of the figure (since we see binocularly but are trying to draw 2-d, a good artist gives the feeling of roundedness in his or her lines), which is not what you would get from Bargue. It's also not clear that Picasso was all that absorbed in the gradients of light and shadow, which you would think would be part of the "takeaway" of the so-called photographic approach -- no one has ever suggested Picasso was a painter of light and shadow. It is interesting (as the author intimates) that Picasso did have an entry into what we would now call Gestalts -- he can evoke the human face and body from the slightest cues, which is part of his enduring power. This is obviously a mixture of the Spanish romanesque, icons, Africa, Cezanne, etc. It would be interesting to work out in more detail why this was so. In the current exhibition in Toronto there is reference made to a recurring dream Picasso had of his body parts getting huge and then getting small, and the same happening to others.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.