You are here:   Dialogue > Bringing the House Down
 

CS: It’s an awfully corny question, but was Quartermaine someone in your imagination or was he based on someone you’d met?

SG: Well, I taught in language schools a lot in Cambridge and it was the spirit of the place, I thought. On the one hand there were the garrulous, rather hopeless, ambitious pushers. I never knew quite what they were pushing for, just more classes or whatever and there was always this sense of a lonely spirit somewhere. He came last in the writing of the play; all the other characters came first.

CS: So he wasn’t even pushing for attention in the creative [process]? SG: No, I don’t know how he happened. I’m very grateful to him for happening but he wasn’t there at the beginning. But as soon as he arrived everything else made sense.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Peter Elmore
August 8th, 2008
2:08 PM
I agree with the sentiments expressed about Islam in the Theatre; a great big burkha-wearing elephant in the room. I have worked and lived in the Middle East where for the most part the concept of Theatre as we know it does not exist except for British Council productions of Drawing Room dramas, comedies and bog standard Shakespeare. The hand wringing Guardian readers would rather burn a "Joan of Art" at a stake fueled with Bibles than offend an Islamist. However I'm sure the "next big thing" from the subsidised theatre will be a biting satire on the persecution of homosexual bishops.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.