You are here:   Boris Johnson > Is Boris the Man to Succeed Cameron?
 

Another  MP pondering the possibility can now envisage him becoming Tory leader, perhaps: "He has flaws and people like that they are obvious. They see that he isn't smooth and didn't come from the political production line. If times are good you can see people giving him a whirl. But would you bet your house and your mortgage on him in an economic crisis? No."

That sense that Boris is fun but unserious, and potentially even dangerous, is the greatest impediment to further advancement. The thought of him being handed the nuclear codes is not a prospect likely to reassure any wavering voters.

And yet, for all the doubts, he has built what it is customary these days to refer to as an extraordinarily potent "brand". When the idea of a run for mayor was first mooted it seemed initially like an in-joke cooked up on the comment desk of the Daily Telegraph. Boris being MP for Henley seemed about right, but could he possibly win over millions in a city as diverse as London? It seemed an unlikely prospect.

Guided by the Australian strategist Lynton Crosby, who made him cut his famously mangled mop of hair and avoid obvious gaffes, he defeated the veteran Ken Livingstone, that odious but cunning embodiment of the London Labour machine.

The first term of his mayoralty was a curious affair. In the 2008 campaign I wrote in the Daily Telegraph in support of Boris, describing him as a cavalier to Livingstone's joyless politically correct roundhead. In office the new mayor was certainly hugely entertaining, but other accomplishments were harder to quantify. There were those grey and blue bikes which appeared on the streets of London, although there was always a suspicion that he had inherited a good idea from Ken and then made it his own. Beyond that, even those who voted for him would struggle if they were put on the spot and asked to list his practical achievements.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Forlornehope
July 28th, 2012
10:07 AM
Well, for all that, just look at the alternative Prime Ministers: Osborne, Gove, Miliband. An energetic, highly intelligent maverick who can put a smile on peoples' faces doesn't seem too bad an idea.

Richard Blogger (@richardblogger)
July 27th, 2012
11:07 AM
So you're saying that Cameron only wants (at most) one and a half terms? That means that he's only a half-Blair. If Cameron loses the 2015 election (whether that is "lost" as in the 2010 election, or lost as in Labour gets a majority) the Tory party will go back to civil war. The "get Boris" campaign will be strong. After the shambles that is Cameron/Osborne my guess is that the party will go for someone seen as competent, and that can only be Hague or Hammond. The latter is more likely since he's already been tried and failed. However, I think Milliband has a lot to be scared of with Boris. Yes, Milliband will be well prepared for 2015 and Boris will just wing it. Yes, Milliband will have no skeletons but Boris will have cupboards full of them. The problem for Milliband is that Boris is his antithesis. Who would people want to go to the pub with or allow to kiss their baby? Milliband or Boris? Basically that is the more important question in people's minds when voting at a general election than who can get growth back.

Philip Arlington
July 25th, 2012
4:07 AM
Nothing that David Cameron does is convincing. Only those immersed in the naval-gazing world of Westminster could ever have imagined he would be an effective leader, but who else have they got? Michael Gove is as inept as the Chancellor, but lucky in that he has a less high profile job. The current system doesn't attract men and women of calibre, with the result that of all the top politicians are almost always under pressure due to their obvious inadequacy. Does anyone whatsoever truly benefit from this permanent shambles of a political culture?

Philip Arlington
July 25th, 2012
3:07 AM
There is no-one near the top of British politics that anyone with any sense would "trust with the mortgage" so that is a nonsensical argument against Boris's chances. As for Bulldog's comments about Boris not having a constituency, he won more personal votes than anyone else in British politics. If he can win London, he can win the whole of southern England. Add some rural constituencies elsewhere, and that is more than half of the UK.

Bulldog Driscol
July 5th, 2012
8:07 AM
Having Boris for PM is wishful thinking by the politically incorrect rugby players of yester-year. Bo-Jo is the last of the patrician Tories, educated, a classicist and a man of letters. As such he has no accessible constituency in modern politics. However his Wodehousian prose and humour has tremendous resonance with the cowed British public.

Anonymous
July 3rd, 2012
10:07 AM
"I have no idea what he believes in other than himself," says a prominent Conservative." Funnily enough that's exactly what could be said about one David Cameron.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.