You are here:   Boris Johnson > Is Boris the Man to Succeed Cameron?
 

Curiously, the existence of this policy void, coupled with yet more scandal in his convoluted private life, does not seem to have done his reputation the slightest bit of harm. Despite strong Labour leads nationally and in London he won his re-election bid, somehow floating above the standard fray, categorised as a celebrity and amusing character who can reach parts of the electorate which conventional politicians struggle to get near. There are parallels with the SNP's Alex Salmond, another big figure whose public reputation is that of the jovial populist, when in reality, just like Boris, he is single-minded and driven to the point of monomania.

In Johnson's case, the books and highly entertaining columns ("like shaggy dog stories written by Cicero", in the opinion of another former colleague), appearances on Have I Got News For You, rugby tackling of opponents on the football field and assorted outrages have made him into the clown prince of the anti-politics movement.

Ask a Tory MP, peer or commentator with teenage children whom their offspring have been most impressed by hearing they have met and there is a fair chance that they will answer with one word: Boris.

For all the forced attempts at bonhomie, such fame does not endear him much to David Cameron or George Osborne. I was standing nearby when, shortly after Boris's triumph in the first mayoral election, the new mayor swept into the room. The Tory leader was elbowed aside by photographers keen to get a picture of the blonde bombshell. Cameron, who is good-natured but ultra-competitive, looked a little put out at being so obviously upstaged.

Cameron and Osborne seem fascinated by the Boris phenomenon, in the way that medical researchers are fascinated by the emergence of particularly virulent new strain of a disease which poses a serious threat to public health. Both make a not terribly convincing show of trying to appear relaxed about his rise, with the prime minister often wearing a forced smile whenever he and Boris are together on the campaign trail. The Conservative leadership wanted him to win re-election, of course, because defeat would have suggested that the Tory tide was going out. They also know that if he had lost Boris would have returned as rapidly as possible to the Conservative benches at Westminster and become a more immediate threat.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Forlornehope
July 28th, 2012
10:07 AM
Well, for all that, just look at the alternative Prime Ministers: Osborne, Gove, Miliband. An energetic, highly intelligent maverick who can put a smile on peoples' faces doesn't seem too bad an idea.

Richard Blogger (@richardblogger)
July 27th, 2012
11:07 AM
So you're saying that Cameron only wants (at most) one and a half terms? That means that he's only a half-Blair. If Cameron loses the 2015 election (whether that is "lost" as in the 2010 election, or lost as in Labour gets a majority) the Tory party will go back to civil war. The "get Boris" campaign will be strong. After the shambles that is Cameron/Osborne my guess is that the party will go for someone seen as competent, and that can only be Hague or Hammond. The latter is more likely since he's already been tried and failed. However, I think Milliband has a lot to be scared of with Boris. Yes, Milliband will be well prepared for 2015 and Boris will just wing it. Yes, Milliband will have no skeletons but Boris will have cupboards full of them. The problem for Milliband is that Boris is his antithesis. Who would people want to go to the pub with or allow to kiss their baby? Milliband or Boris? Basically that is the more important question in people's minds when voting at a general election than who can get growth back.

Philip Arlington
July 25th, 2012
4:07 AM
Nothing that David Cameron does is convincing. Only those immersed in the naval-gazing world of Westminster could ever have imagined he would be an effective leader, but who else have they got? Michael Gove is as inept as the Chancellor, but lucky in that he has a less high profile job. The current system doesn't attract men and women of calibre, with the result that of all the top politicians are almost always under pressure due to their obvious inadequacy. Does anyone whatsoever truly benefit from this permanent shambles of a political culture?

Philip Arlington
July 25th, 2012
3:07 AM
There is no-one near the top of British politics that anyone with any sense would "trust with the mortgage" so that is a nonsensical argument against Boris's chances. As for Bulldog's comments about Boris not having a constituency, he won more personal votes than anyone else in British politics. If he can win London, he can win the whole of southern England. Add some rural constituencies elsewhere, and that is more than half of the UK.

Bulldog Driscol
July 5th, 2012
8:07 AM
Having Boris for PM is wishful thinking by the politically incorrect rugby players of yester-year. Bo-Jo is the last of the patrician Tories, educated, a classicist and a man of letters. As such he has no accessible constituency in modern politics. However his Wodehousian prose and humour has tremendous resonance with the cowed British public.

Anonymous
July 3rd, 2012
10:07 AM
"I have no idea what he believes in other than himself," says a prominent Conservative." Funnily enough that's exactly what could be said about one David Cameron.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.