You are here:   Conservative Party > Will Michael Gove Go All the Way to No 10?
 

Gove says he wants to stay at education until the election to see his reforms through, and barring unforeseen disasters that seems to be very much Cameron's intention. The pair are friends and Gove is part of the metropolitan modernising gang, the socially liberal Notting Hill set, that took over the Conservative leadership in 2005. But he can think for himself.

Might he be able to persuade Cameron to look again at introducing more selection? What was good enough for David Cameron and Boris Johnson (Eton), George Osborne (St Paul's), Nick Clegg (Westminster) and Michael Gove (Robert Gordon's College, Aberdeen) should surely be good enough for bright children from poor and modest backgrounds?

"[Cameron] is a classic Tory, but also a radical meritocrat. But he doesn't believe in academic selection. What he wants to see in state schools are the kinds of things that people pay money for — proper uniforms, classical subjects rigorously taught, and for teachers to be respected."

However, not more selection, it seems.

"As long as the coalition lasts I don't think there is any room for manoeuvre. I don't think the Liberal Democrats would countenance any form of selection. Selection is an incendiary subject in England. My view is that it's better to avoid it because you can make much more progress in other areas. Selection is not a necessary condition of having a successful education system."

Gove says there is a "shadow" hanging over selective education because of the way in which it was implemented. It has left behind, he says, a fear on the part of many that under such a system only a quarter of children can achieve anything and the rest are written off.

Perhaps that is false public perception, but isn't the government's approach, while welcome, ultimately inadequate because it relies on the idea that a rising tide lifts all boats? It doesn't do enough to catapult the bright child from a poor background into a truly elite school and environment where he or she will be taught to compete on equal terms with their contemporaries from Eton.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Saltaire
March 10th, 2012
7:03 PM
"...a man who thinks too much. Such men are dangerous."???!! And this coming from a teacher of all people? btw, the Building Schools for the Future programme was a nonsense. Labour designed it but they knew all along that there simply wasn't the money to pay for it.

Despairing teaching
February 25th, 2012
10:02 AM
“The Minister [of State for Education], in the short time that he has been at his post, has won the affection and respect of noble Lords on all sides of the House. He is a good listener, which makes it all the more difficult to direct the kind of fire and brimstone that this legislation [Education Bill] evokes against his person. He is an honourable man but behind him lurks a lean and hungry man who thinks too much. Such men are dangerous. We are on the verge of implementing measures that will change the educational landscape of our country for generations, and in a radical way…” “The money to pay for the various provisions described in this Bill, as I understand it, has been snatched from a number of pockets and there are serious consequences to expect from all of them. First, there was the abandonment of the Building Schools for the Future programme which, I remind your Lordships, was intended to renew or rebuild every secondary school in the land. .. Now the BSF programme, intended to reverse these depredations, has been brought to an abrupt end and the money wrung from the wreckage has been poured into the measures before us.” “Secondly, local authorities are being asset-stripped to finance the freedoms of the new academies. I fear that we will one day rue this emasculation of local and accountable government …” Lord Griffiths of Burry Port, June 2011 We can't say we haven't been warned.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.