Determinedly gritty drama: Mads Mikkelsen in â€śThe Huntâ€ť
Events, dear boy, events have made the director Thomas Vinterbergâ€™s The Hunt pertinent in a way he simply couldnâ€™t have foreseen when he was shooting in rural, deer-hunting, small-town Denmark. A pretty straightforward story about a teacher wrongly accused of child abuse, it arrives in Britain with the Jimmy Savile scandal in full swing, with other showbusiness figures (and even a bishop) being arrested and questioned on suspicion of similar behaviour. The rumourÂ mill is in full spin, and the hysteria over who did what to whom and when has reached McCarthyite levels. In this febrile, borderline unhinged atmosphere, and with its echoes of Lillian Hellmanâ€™s The Childrenâ€™s Hour, The Hunt feels almost subversive.
Mads Mikkelsen, the spikey-featured, dour actorÂ perhaps best known to us asÂ the bloody-eyed villain LeÂ Chiffre in Casino Royale, playsÂ Lucas, whose already somewhat beleaguered existenceÂ (his marriage is over and heÂ has lost his job) is utterlyÂ crushed when the little daughter of one of his pals suggests toÂ her mother that he has exposedÂ himself to her. From this pointÂ on there is no hope for Lucas:Â he is an utter outcast, shunned,Â reviled, physically assaulted, unable even to buy food in hostile shops. He seems to take it all in a bemused, oddly passive fashion, although this might have more to do with Mikkelsenâ€™s sombre, less-is-more approach to acting which, in its solemn inexpressiveness, strikes the only unrealistic note in this otherwise determinedly gritty drama. Indeed, nobody I can recall so much as breaks into a smile throughout, and the prevailing sense of social purpose reminds one of an old BBC Play for Today. This is not then a feelgood movie for the pre-festive season.
But it retains our attention, and more importantly, questions some of the assumptions which, when it comes to the last taboo remaining to us, are now widespread and regarded as largely unchallengeable. One of these is that the innocence of children makes their word gospel. Only an increasingly sentimentalised, infantilised society can believe this; it was quite accepted, in more formally religious times, that a child could lie, manipulate and be wantonly cruel, that they could indeed be wicked. Here, little Klara (Annika Wedderkopp) is reacting to what she sees as a rebuff to her affections from Lucas. How much she understands the consequences of her actions is unclear, but to give her the benefit of the doubt she is, as the law would put it, at least reckless as to the consequences. That, Iâ€™m afraid, didnâ€™t make me feel any less like giving her a good thwacking.
But the point is that her actions and motives are never called into question. She is helped along here by her mother suggesting that her haziness on the details is obviously down to her desire to erase the memory, and that sheâ€™s therefore acting quite naturally:Â the unimaginative clichĂ© of therapy further seals Lucasâ€™s fate. Furthermore, should Klara not be told how her little lie could destroy anotherâ€™s life just as effectively as hers in turn could have been if she had been abused? The adultsâ€™ readiness to believe her springs from their desire to believe her; their desire to punish is far greater and more genuine than their shock or disgust. Things eventually right themselves, in a way, but the film ends on a gloomy and pessimistic note, suggesting that for the most determined, smoke without fire is more than enough.