You are here:   Classical Music > Political Misconduct
 
The maestro who mortgaged his soul: Valery Gergiev conducts in Palmyra after its recapture from IS (©www.kremlin.ru)


The life of Willem Mengelberg, formative conductor of Amsterdam’s Concertgebouw orchestra and founder of its Mahler tradition, has finally been published. The second volume of a biography by Frits Zwart has appeared in Holland 65 years after the conductor’s death, and to very little attention. It was all such a long time ago, shrug the Dutch. Let the old master rest on his withered laurels.

Mengelberg was banned from conducting in 1945 for hobnobbing with Holland’s Nazi rulers and, specifically, for an interview he gave to the Völkischer Beobachter in 1940, saying he had drunk a glass of champagne the day his country capitulated to the Germans. You can see why the Dutch don’t like to be reminded of this pivotal figure in their music history and why the rest of the world has consigned this brilliant, often contrarian interpreter to the margins of public memory.

Nevertheless, Mengelberg demands to be remembered, more perhaps now than ever. He was a prototype music director who bowed to the requirements of an evil regime. If you thought that doesn’t happen any more, look now at Russia and Venezuela and you will see history doubling back on its tracks, as if nothing has registered from the recent past, nothing was learned.

Mengelberg’s defence was that he was German by heritage and he preferred German culture to Dutch provincialism. Uninterested in the world beyond his scores, all he wanted to do was carry on making music in an exemplary concert hall, oblivious to the murder of some of his musicians by the occupation government. He could not be held accountable, he argued, for the Nazis being Nazis. He just carried on doing his job regardless of the noises outside.

He represents one modus vivendi for a powerful music director in a totalitarian state. The other is Wilhelm Furtwängler, whose cover story, forensically exposed in Ronald Harwood’s play Taking Sides, was rooted in a profound, perhaps overdeveloped, sense of personal responsibility. Furtwängler maintained that his duty between 1933 and 1945 was to uphold the highest level of German civilisation as comfort and shelter for a troubled nation, preserving the best of what was German for a post-Hitler renewal. Unlike Mengelberg, Furtwängler risked his position to extricate a number of people from concentration camps and help them flee the country. He did not suppress his conscience. He carried on doing his job, aware of all that was going on around him — and in spite of it, like the tragic curator of antiquities who stayed in Palmyra when the Isis desecrators rode in.

Both of these survival strategies were flawed. Mengelberg’s lacked conscience. Furtwängler refused to recognise that his presence at the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra reinforced Adolf Hitler’s sense of cultural destiny. Both conductors served the devil and both got off lightly, neither spending a night at risk or in jail. (The Palmyra curator, Khalid al-Assad, was beheaded for his heroism.)

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Hernan
November 2nd, 2016
7:11 AM
Once Donald Trump, an outright fascist, gets elected in the United States, will you ask Maestro Dudamel to resign from the LAPhil?

Neil McGowan
October 31st, 2016
9:10 PM
This article is ill-judged and unfactual. Standpoint should never have run this biased and muck-raking nonsense.

Anonymous
October 29th, 2016
3:10 PM
this article is out of context, taste. Music is not politics... very sad you relate them.

Alexis Hauser
October 29th, 2016
12:10 PM
Here is the OTHER example which can never be brought enough to public awareness: There w e r e heroes in those days, take i.e. ERICH KLEIBER, who had one of the top jobs in Germany as general music director of the Berlin Staatsoper under den Linden, and conducted the world premiere of Alban Berg's "Wozzeck"; he left his post on his own decision with no refugee status, disgusted by the Nazi rise in Germany, creating miracles with orchestras all over South America during the war years and raised his Berlin born son Karl Ludwig who grew up in Buenos Aires as Carlos. When ERICH KLEIBER was welcomed back to the Berlin Staatsoper after the war, then in the Soviet occupied controlled East part of the city, he, becoming aware of another non-democratic development, left again, preferring a less secure guest conducting life to a highly subventioned and prestigious post under a dictatorial polit bureau... When he finally returned to his native Vienna, where he recorded, thanks to a British recording company, a timeless "Rosenkavalier" and Beethoven's 9th symphony, he was viewed by most locals as an enemy, a traitor...!!! HE alone should have been the Music Director of the Vienna Staatsoper after 1945 and in 1955, for all the artistic AND moral reasons!!! To the best of my knowledge, now in 2016, Vienna still has not named one of its bigger streets (let alone one of its small "Gassen") after one of its true heroes. ERICH, who served and loved music no less than all the Furtwuangkers and Mengelbergs of the world, died heartbroken prematurely...HE and others like him, i.e. Fritz Busch and his brothers, are the ones who to be falways remembered, for their artistry AND their character!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.