
The hospital trust seeking permission to withdraw medical treatment that is keeping a one-year old child alive explained its reasoning today.
As I reported yesterday, the boy -- who may be identified only as RB -- was born with a rare neuromuscular condition and has never been able to breathe for more than a few minutes without a ventilator.
Michael Mylonas, counsel for the trust, told Mr Justice McFarlane that RB's condition was not thought to affect his brain function.
The court might be told that this should weigh in favour of maintaining his life.
But, said counsel, it would make RB's condition all the more unbearable as he glimpsed what others could do.
The trust was seeking permission to withdraw the baby's life-support "to allow him a peaceful, calm and dignified death", Mr Mylonas said.
Even with a tracheostomy, RB's quality of life was such that he he would continue to lead a "miserable, sad and pitiful existence".
The hearing is likely to conclude next week.
Post your comment
Joshua Rozenberg is an independent legal commentator who presents Law in Action on BBC Radio 4.
- World Youth Day Diary: Day One
- Breivik and Anti-Muslim Bigotry
- Who'd be a TLA?
- Daniel Johnson on Elena Bonner
- In praise of the essay
- Told You So
- Analysis: Al-Qaeda After Bin Laden
- Help JIMAS
- How Western Jihadis See Libya
- Sumption plays hard to get
- The Commentator — A Serious New Website
- Supreme Court: runners, riders and delays
- In defence of Quilliam
- Self-censorship in the British Media
- Parliament Square is not Tahrir Square
- How does this end?
- Gaddafi has little to fear from ICC
- "We call them the nutters, because that's what they are"
- Peter Oborne's Hypocrisies


















