You are here:   Reputations >  Overrated > Overrated: Giles Fraser
 

He is recognisably part of the English radical tradition of plain-speaking preachers. Alas, unlike in the days of John Wesley, today's radical churchmen ally themselves with a liberal Left that is almost entirely anti-theist, and actively wants to remove this irrational creed from public life. 

Fraser once wrote in Socialist Worker: "Christianity is...the religion of turning the other cheek, communal meals and blessed are the poor. In contrast, Christendom is what Christianity became when it got mixed up with the Roman Empire." 

There is, of course, some truth in this, but when Fraser argues that "what secularisation specifically attacks is state religion, the religion of Christendom" and that "post-Christendom provides an opportunity for a very different Christian voice to emerge", he is deeply misguided. For secularism today instead leads the state itself to take on the role of Church, to become the arbiter of morality, the vehicle for social change, and even the font of happiness and hope. No wonder that intolerant statists are so keen to remove the influence of the rival, older faith.

Jesus said: "Love your enemies"; he didn't say actively help them destroy you. But that, unfortunately, is what the Church of England seems intent on doing.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Daniel Heslop
February 22nd, 2012
1:02 PM
He has written a brilliant book on Nietzsche. It's no surprise that it takes a Christian to understand Nietzsche, who seemingly alone among atheists, understood Christianity better than many Christians.

Mr Grumpy
December 15th, 2011
4:12 PM
Hmmm, so did the complex and interesting Dr Fraser venture out into the encampment to make the case for capitalism?

Tim Footman
November 24th, 2011
5:11 PM
Fraser is a far more complex and interesting philosophical creature than you make out. He may well have started out as a banner-waving Eagletonian, but last year he published the book Confessions of a Reluctant Capitalist, in which he described his own conversion to support for a market economy, and his belief that capitalism can comfortably co-exist with a Christian morality (which, incidentally, is not incompatible with his stance on gay rights – it's all about freedom, isn't it?). Just because he wanted the church to allow the protesters to remain doesn't mean he supported all their demands. "First Church of Christ, Marxist"? Hardly.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.