You are here:   Reputations >  Overrated > Overrated: Umberto Eco
 

In Eco's latest novel, The Prague Cemetery, his idée fixe mutates into a gothic fantasy embracing Jesuits, Freemasons and above all Jews, culminating in the most pernicious conspiracy theory of them all: the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Eco claims that he has invented only one character, the protagonist Simone Simonini, whose fictitious diaries record how he forges the Protocols, frames Dreyfus and infects Europe with anti-Semitism. "But on reflection," he adds, "even Simone Simonini ... did in some sense exist. Indeed, to be frank, he is still with us." In other words, Eco deliberately confuses fact and fiction. Having immersed his readers in conspiracy theories against the Jews, he then leaves them wondering whether some of these vile slanders might, after all, be true.

The trouble with what his publisher calls "an inspired twisting of history and fiction" is that Eco is playing with fire. This time it is not a game. There is nothing esoteric about the Protocols, millions of copies of which circulate in the Muslim world. Anti-Semitism is on the march, not only in the Middle East but across the globe, including the West, fuelled by that multiplier of conspiracy theories, the internet. The leaders of Iran have made Holocaust denial state policy and signalled that they plan a second Holocaust, using nuclear technology supplied by, among others, Germany and Russia — the two worst persecutors of Jews in the recent past. Eco's frivolous treatment of Jew-hatred as a cloak-and-dagger mystery, to fund his collection of incunabula, while real Jews are targeted by terrorists from New York to Mumbai and from London to Buenos Aires has left many readers feeling queasy. 

The doubts sown by the book fall on fertile soil, for ours is a culture that long ago lost its bearings, thanks to the prestige of postmodernists such as Umberto Eco. He stands for the intellectuals of the 21st century who, like those of the last century, commit trahison des clercs by flirting with anti-Semitism when their duty is to take a clear stand against it.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Cristian
March 29th, 2012
1:03 AM
This article is one of the more spot-on illustrations of Hitchens's observation that "the literal mind is baffled by the ironic one."

Francis Fitzhugh
March 22nd, 2012
12:03 PM
There is an article responding to this one here: http://inwhichidigress.tumblr.com/post/19729304847/standpoints-attack-on...

F. Fitzhugh
March 21st, 2012
10:03 PM
Regarding the first paragraph: The website referred to in the paragraph is a fan website, not a personal website. I can't see any evidence that Eco ever said it, let alone said it without citing Chesterton, who he has referred once or twice in his published writings. Regarding the second paragraph: Is it really unreasonable not to believe in the contents of Joyce's Ulysses? It is a work of fiction, after all. Regarding the fourth paragraph: The message of Foucault's Pendulum (as other people have pointed out above) is not that 'conspiracy theories may after all be true, and secret societies may actually exist' but the opposite. The accusation of anti-Semitism in the second page of the essay seems rather baseless. If the case is so strong, why quote from the publisher's blog rather than the book itself? Anyway, to accuse Eco of trahison des clercs in the standard postmodernist model seems very unfair. As far as I know he has never flirted with the far left, opposed the academic boycott on Israel (and was accused of racism as a result), and constantly opposes the anti-Semitism of both the extreme right and the extreme left in his L'Espresso column. Daniel Johnson seems extremely unfamiliar with Eco's work, which makes the choice of subject here seem a bit strange.

Frederick
March 21st, 2012
4:03 AM
Perhaps then you prefer the inherently totalitarian "certainties" of right-wing religious fundamentalism as described here?

Anonymous
March 16th, 2012
9:03 AM
I've only read 2 books by Eco over the years: "The Name of the Rose" (I still wish someone would explain the title to me) and "Foucault's Pendulum". I have not read "The Prague Cemetery", so I can't comment on it. Re the other two, I would like to express a pair of opinions: (a) Considering all of the effort invested in writing The Name of the Rose, you'd have thought that Eco would have been able to provide a more satisfying solution to the mystery occupying the overwhelming bulk of this lengthy novel; (b) When asked once to summarize the plot of "Foucault's Pendulum" in one sentence, I replied "People are as stupid and gullible today as they were 2000 years ago". In that context, I agree with the comment of ZD.

freddie omm
March 12th, 2012
5:03 PM
if post-modernism, as mr johnson implies, refuses to take anything seriously, in a culture cut adrift from mening, it seems harsh to blame it (and eco, as one of its prime proponents)for fanning anti-semitism... nor is it right to condemn umberto eco, de haut en bas, as anti-semitic. i too was quite baffled by "foucault's pendulum", and read it as a satire of its subject. i may have got that badly wrong, of course!

Adam Victor Nazareth Brandizzi
March 9th, 2012
6:03 PM
One could use the time spent on this article for reading a good, reasonable critic to Humberto Eco words. Really, mr. Johnson, if you really despise Eco this much you would make a better case by posting a link to some other critical article. Do you really think Eco's quote is the same as the allegedly Chesterton's one? Do you really see such a hollow postmodernist author when reading Eco's works? I have never read Foucault's Pendulum but that seems pretty unlikely that the conclusion you got can be made from it, given the books from Humberto Eco I've read. I cannot help but believe that your rant is just the result of a pretty prejudiced interpretation of Prague Cemetery. You see some kind of subtle anti-Semite message in the book and as a consequence feels obliged to bash all the writer's work. I have not read the book but your text just makes me believe that there is no such subtle plot in it. OTOH there is a really unsubtle misinterpretation in your critic, which ends as some defense of a grotesque untouchability of the history of Jewish people, an argument built upon some true statements, some somewhat debatable affirmations and one or two pretty nonsensical associations. So, if you really want to bash Mr. Eco, I really believe you would be well advised to outsource the critic to someone better prepared or, at least, more controlled.

DBS
March 7th, 2012
7:03 PM
Overrated: Daniel Johnson

REC
March 7th, 2012
6:03 PM
Mr. Johnson might want to take a look at Eco's "Six Walks in the Fictional Woods" and pay particular attention to the sixth chapter, "Fictional Protocols".

CDriver
March 7th, 2012
5:03 PM
Oh, I get it - the whole article is itself a post-modernist joke. Otherwise the factual inaccuracies (Foucault's Pendulum doesn't suggest that "secret societies may actually exist", rather that people want them to exist despite the fact that they don't) don't make sense - surely no-one can intentionally misunderstand Eco this much, can they?

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.