You are here:   Columns >  Points East & West >
 
September 2008

The story is told that, during Lebanon’s civil war (1975–90), four Soviet diplomats were kidnapped by a terrorist group. Two days later its leader received a box containing the testicles of his son – and a warning from the Russians: “Don’t ever bother our people again.”

The Soviets’ reprisal was ruthless but effective. The three surviving hostages were released unharmed and no more Soviets were kidnapped in Lebanon. A brutal response targeting something deeply valued by the enemy deterred future attempts at blackmail. Is the West doing the same with Iran?

Not quite. At a meeting in Geneva in July, the major powers gave Iran a deadline of August 2 to accept its latest proposal: Iran would not increase its enrichment capacity by adding new centrifuges and the international community would not introduce new sanctions against Iran. This offer is in fact a retreat from the previous demand to stop enrichment or face sanctions — as four UN Security Council resolutions indeed require. The package of incentives is an even more flattering and generous offer than the one made in 2006.

Predictably, the deadline was ignored, just as all the others have been. All Iran had to do was to stop installing new centrifuges in Natanz, its uranium enrichment facility, and then start negotiations on the latest incentive package that the six nations offered Iran in exchange for a suspension of its uranium enrichment programme. Instead, Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, announced the installation of thousands of new centrifuges the week after the Geneva meeting. Then his foreign minister ridiculed the notion of a deadline: “The language of ­deadline-­setting is not understandable to us.”

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
chris
October 10th, 2008
8:10 PM
The Iranian military is what secures the regime's control over the Persian people. Anti-regime groups cannot communicate or mobilize without getting ground into kebab. Three carrier groups and a few airborne units could, over time, dramatically diminish Iran's offensive capabilities. Strategically important regions would soon be out of reach and the anti-regime elements would flourish like a desert after a rain.

Anonymous
August 28th, 2008
8:08 PM
What an incisive piece! Years ago the handful of western scholars of Iran who had gotten over their astonishment at Iranian culture's gift of flattery recognized and wrote about built in duplicity of the culture. This duplicity is now married to the logical conclusion that Iran is immune from any threats - either because it is protected by the Islamic interpretation of God or because it is too clever for the rest of the world. Over the past decade the Islamic regime has used money and flattery, as well as threats, to silence that part of the Iranian diaspora that might have provided perspective and intelligence. The regime has picked up the theme of the great Iranian culture, and is now using this theme to discourage any meaningful punitive action for the flagrant political actions from nuclear arms, missiles and continuous violation of human rights. Dealing with Iran is like accepting the gift of a poisoned rose.

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.