You are here:   Columns >  The Outsider's Diary > Universal Unions
 

* * *

The Royal Institute of British Architects was the venue for an evening remembering the late Vaclav Havel, hosted by the Czech ambassador, Michael Zantovsky, and Sir Tom Stoppard.

After a request to turn off all mobile phones, the first voice was a recording of Havel himself speaking. Songs, readings and excerpts from his plays followed, interspersed with archive and recent documentary footage. Along with Stoppard's tribute, these snatches of film were the pinnacle of the evening. Even to think of Havel is, I find, to feel a lifting sensation. At the end there was recent footage of him swimming alone towards the camera and then a cutaway of a pond with water-lilies. From underwater Havel suddenly popped up and addressed the camera: "You may now turn on your mobile phones. After all, life must go on."

* * *

Fighting totalitarianism is something everybody says they would do when they live in freedom. But it is remarkable how few people even notice, let alone object to, incursions within their own orbit. One victim of a totalitarian mindset in our own country, Ray Honeyford, died recently. It was in the early 1980s in the Salisbury Review that this quiet Bradford headmaster committed the error of saying something that was true but nobody wanted to hear. He believed that pupils at his school, even if they came from the Indian subcontinent, would be better able to study if they spoke English. For this he was hounded from his profession and vilified as a "racist". Three decades on, the suggestions that brought such vitriol down upon him are the policies of the major parties in all European countries.

At the National Theatre a few weeks after Honeyford's death I watched the opening night of a wonderful show about free expression called Can We Talk About This? (see Anne McElvoy's review on page 70). 

  A couple of years ago at the outset of his project I encouraged the director to consider highlighting the Honeyford affair among others. The show did so, wittily and concisely, but this vindication comes too late, of course, for Honeyford himself.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Jon Stubbings
April 14th, 2012
8:04 AM
I'm not quite sure what people are so scared of when it comes to homosexuality - after all - this whole debate seems to be about the significance of a word - and some people think they should have the right to guard and preserve exclusive rights to its exact meaning. Murray is right in some respects - live and let live - even if that means that we have to 'tolerate' the bigotry of of certain groups whose moral convictions are informed by religious conviction/conditioning. Interestingly though, Murray, and the editorial board of 'Standpoint' are rather less philosophical about such bigotry when it is being expressed by Muslims rather than Christians.

James David Martin
April 4th, 2012
8:04 PM
Marriage is not just an arbitrarily constructed institution. It is based upon the recognition of the deliriously magical fact that the sexual encounter yields new life. Only this profound fact could generate the impetus to form an institution such as marriage. It is, quintessentially and exclusively, heterosexual, reflecting the reality of sexual intercourse, marriage's antecedent. A marriage that does not stem from the natural complementarity of the sexes is a marriage in name only. New legislation will not alter the reality, but will bastardize language. It is a shame that the normally sharp Douglas Murray should fail to note this. Perhaps his judgement is fogged.

Old Slaughter
April 3rd, 2012
1:04 PM
Douglas... Why 'two people'? Why not three?

marie
March 28th, 2012
8:03 PM
A funny thing for a man who claims he believes in democracy to say if you don't mind me saying so. A democractic country is a country in which our goverments govern according to the will of the majority. For years our worthless political class have chosen only to hear the demands of minorities. (many of whom they imported into our land against our will in the first place!) Nobody put this nonsense of gay 'marriage' in their manifestos and what is worse is the fact that only a minorty within the minority that are the gay community are calling for this! But yet again Britons are to live THEIR ideal socity with OUR lives. indeed our worthless elite have a name for any who will dare to speak against them on this; 'homophobe' which translates as; 'you have no right to a say in the society in which you live'

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.