You are here:   Constitutional Affairs > ONLINE ONLY: The UN Human Rights Council: Not Fit for Purpose
 

Contempt for the United Nations' professed values and institutions is no barrier to diplomatic grandeur at the organization's Turtle Bay headquarters. Quite the opposite, in fact. An increasing number of UN member states scorn its founding documents - the Charter, Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention. These states, dubbed the ‘The Abusers Club' by human rights activists, are drawn mainly from the developing, Arab, and Islamic worlds. They are co-ordinating their assault on human rights and political freedoms with increasing, and disturbing, success, say UN sources.

Certainly the Abusers Club has hijacked the new Geneva-based Human Rights Council. The Council was inaugurated in June 2006 to replace the discredited Human Rights Commission. Even by UN standards the Commission was an embarrassment. In 2003, for example, the Commission was chaired by Najat al-Hajjaji, the Libyan ambassador. Predictably, draft resolutions critical of Sudan and Zimbabwe were defeated; and a resolution was passed effectively approving armed struggle in Palestine. Zimbabwe remained a member of the Commission, even while in 2005 Mugabe's thugs launched Operation Murambatsvina, which made 700,000 people homeless.

Proponents of the new 47-member Human Rights Council claimed it would put an end to such grotesqueries. The General Assembly resolution establishing the new organisation pledged that members must uphold the "highest standards in the promotion and protection of human rights" and would be subject to "periodic review". The Council was raised to the status of a subsidiary body of the General Assembly. Members are elected by a majority vote of the General Assembly, with the aim of "mainstreaming" human rights into the United Nations system. This is especially important as this December marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

This new electoral system was supposed to provide a means of keeping the worst human rights abusers off the Council. In practice it failed to take into account the growing anti-western sentiment at the United Nations, which regards almost all talk of human rights and political freedoms as a new form of imperialism. The membership of the Council alone affords evidence that ‘The Abusers Club', is growing in power and influence.

View Full Article
 
Share/Save
 
 
 
 
Ron
September 22nd, 2008
3:09 PM
The UN has become some sort of comfort or addiction because otherwise it’s hard to see why western countries put up with it. Absolutely nothing of value has come out of this organisation in a long time and now it is used to destroy the very foundations on which it stands. The countries doing it are, as the article suggest, well organised and the UN now is just another tier in the struggle to destroy western values which are seen as a threat.

john d
September 22nd, 2008
11:09 AM
Against Richard: we should, pace John McCain, found a League of Democracies (membership by invitation onlyWe should not quit the UN where the West still has 3 vetos. Only if the ~General Assembly attempts to take over from the Security Council. Only then should we quit the UN en bloc and immediately suspend all foreign aid to those states who support the OIC's destruction of the UN.

devorgilla
September 21st, 2008
11:09 PM
The Cairo Declaration of Human Rights (1990) is sharia based and has been adopted by all the Organisation of the Islamic Conference countries (57 states) in 1997. The aim is to supplant UNDHR (1948) with this document. That will mean global human rights will be defined by sharia, which is a discriminatory system which does not recognise the rights of other religions or non-Islamic world views. IF this succeeds it will be Stage One in the Global Caliphate. Frightening.

Richard
September 21st, 2008
10:09 PM
I spoke about this hijacking and abuse the language of human rights last year during a symposium about Amnesty International. The only course left to the West in the long run is to abandon the United Nations as a failed institution and form a league of democracies. We cannot pretend that the UN has any sort of legitimacy,

Frances Waddams
September 21st, 2008
10:09 PM
Well said, Sir!

Post your comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.